With? Or without?

Vøringsfossen viewing bridge ( Photo: Erik den yngre, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons)
Vøringsfossen viewing bridge ( Photo: Erik den yngre, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons)

I know. Unusual title isn’t it? But it’s where this story wanted to go. 

The most famous waterfall in Norway is Vøringsfossen. Or is it Vøringfossen, without the “s” as it’s also spelled?

The word, presumably with either spelling, means “the respected one.” Fair enough. Vøringsfossen thunders 182 metres down over the edge of a canyon with a free-fall plunge of 145 metres. 

Lonely Planet says Vøringsfossen in 2018 “was the most visited natural attraction in Norway.” Forbes says top place goes to Pulpit Rock; Trip Advisor says it’s Geirangerfjord—and Vøringsfossen doesn’t appear on either list.

A vast amount of water from the falls is siphoned off for power generation but in tourist season, the flow is increased for visitors, who number 650,000 annually. Or is it 300,000 annually as a conflicting source states?

Travellers have been attracted to Vøringsfossen since the nineteenth century. In 1872 a path with  was built so tourists could ride horseback from Måbødalen valley and then walk 1,500 stairs to the waterfall. Less than twenty years later a road was tunnelled through the mountains and the Fossli Hotel opened near the falls. Less than ten years after that, cruise-ship passengers from Eidfjord began arriving.

Like us, some of these travellers had to decide: are we satisfied with seeing the falls from the top without hiking into the canyon for different vantage points and close-up views? 

Over the course of about three hours on a Saturday morning in early September, there were twenty other hikers who made the same decision as us to take the “moderately challenging” trail. Half of the trail is easy but my diary reads, “Longest 0.9 km of my life,” referring to navigating chunky boulders jumbled together, slippery with the misty spray from Vøringsfossen. 

According to the Norwegian government, improvements at the falls were “desperately needed to make the attraction safer to visit, as a number of people had died in previous years.” We saw the Phase One improvements, which included viewing platforms, stairs and fences. Two years later, the second addition to the attraction opened—to mixed reviews.

A remarkable steel bridge spanning 45 metres (or is it 47?) with 99 stairs now allows visitors to cover a difference in height of 16.5 meters from one edge of the gorge to the other. The bridge’s unusual X shape makes it accessible from two points on safe paths along the edge of the canyon. 

Is it a “spectacular bridge over the falls!?” as Norway’s Tourist Board exclaims? 

Or a “circus in the mountains?” as one headline read. 

Are we better off with or without it?

Norwegian author, photographer and mountain climber Stein P. Aasheim says,

It is a rape of one of Norway's most beautiful natural attractions. The worst treatment of a Norwegian nature icon ever.
Anyone who wants to develop a tourism based on sustainability and nature-friendly adventure tours—and not cruise-based gondola tourism or strange steel constructions—falls into the "sees problems" category.

Or is it a good improvement as journalist Kai Olsen writes?

…the idea of ​​untouched nature is not sustainable. Facilitation is absolutely necessary.
We can also question whether "unspoiled nature" is what sells best.
The tourist bridge over Vøringsfossen will become an attraction in itself, and is also necessary to handle the large number of visitors.
If we make a living from building cruise ships, we must also accept that they visit Norwegian fjords.
It is easy to believe that tourism related to mountain hiking is nature-friendly and based on sustainability. It literally isn't.
Tens of thousands of feet have removed the vegetation in many places, and the rain takes away what remains. That problem can be solved with more facilities, such as footpaths and stairs…
Hiking is a great activity, and absolutely sustainable if you go for a walk away from home. But even if the tourists walk the 11 kilometers over the egg, they may have traveled 1,000 kilometers by car for the experience.
The demand for sustainability is therefore extremely complicated, and perhaps not entirely feasible in an economy like ours.
I can guarantee that as long as you avoid a few well-known attractions, you will surely feel solitude in large parts of the Norwegian mountain world.

Or do we take the (satirical?) approach like Mikkel Bolstad’s response to Kai, written under a title that translates to “Selfish Adventurers”?

Aasheim has lived from his experiences in untouched nature long enough.
“When we can obviously no longer live by pumping oil out of the North Sea, we must have something else to live by. Then maybe tourism is a good alternative?” writes turbo writer Kai A. Olsen on 10 October, referring to the cruise industry. 
What is more natural than replacing one environmentally hostile industry with another environmentally hostile industry?
Olsen has several good points: "If we make a living from building cruise ships, we must also accept that they visit Norwegian fjords." And if we have cruise ships, we must have gondolas. Or the cruise ships won't come. Or something like that.
Busy tourists don't have time to keep up with his old-fashioned stuff anyway.
Soon the hybrid ships that sail on frying oil will arrive from the galley, and if that is not enough, we always have electricity. Well then, maybe there will be competition for electricity in the future, but then we get to build a few more wind turbine parks.
In any case, we have enough mountains that we still cannot make money from.
When we first have to secure Vøringsfossen, it should be the most natural thing in the world to build a steel bridge reminiscent of a collapsed scaffolding across Norway's most visited natural attraction.
Natural beauty, you say? What romantic nonsense. Let's make her up hard and sell her to the highest bidder. Should only line dancers have the pleasure of experiencing the waterfall from the middle of Måbødalen?

What do you think?

Not just about this bridge but about the facilities we’ve built here in Canada, like the Columbia Icefield Skywalk, or three gondolas being proposed: from Banff‘s townsite to the base of Norquay; from Silvertip Resort to the summit of Mount Lady MacDonald; and across the North Saskatchewan River between downtown Edmonton at end Whyte Avenue?

Let’s make it easy and cheap, so that many people can come and see what is great and beautiful in our country.

Said Thomas Heftye.

When he founded the Norwegian Tourist Association.

In 1868.


Aasheim, Stein P. “Tivoli i fjellheimen.” NRK. Sept 26, 2020.

Bolstad, Mikkel Soya. “Egoistiske eventyrere.” Dagsavisen. October 20, 2020.

“Carl-Viggo Holmebakk designs new pedestrian bridge over the Vøringsfossen waterfall in Norway.” FloorNature Architecture & Surfaces. September 29, 2020.

Koenig, Alexander. “New attraction in Norway: the stair bridge over the Vøringsfossen waterfall.First Class & More. August 23, 2020.

Nikel, David. “How To See Norway’s Epic Waterfall Vøringsfossen.” Forbes. Jan 3, 2022.

Nikel, David. “Norway’s Newest Roadside Attraction Divides Opinion.” Forbes. Sept 28, 2020.

Olsen, Kai I. “Vill natur er oppskrytt.” NRK. Oct 10, 2020.

9 Responses

  1. Question is who owns it?
    All land should be private property.
    Private property is better protected unless the government has the power to tax which is theft. All governments are immoral and economic monsters.
    Governments which have the right to tax void the natural law of private property.

  2. Just amazing to see, thanks, though a bit too many scary heights for me as a flatlander. The trade offs between hydro-power and tourism was interesting. I wonder how the choice was made…on economics and timing or what?
    UNESCO’s biosphere reserves are an attempt to balance the protection and use of nature. They are designed with a core protected area, a transition zone, then a use zone to measure and monitor human impacts. Magellan reminds us of the importance of allowing people to be in nature and then they will tend to value and protect nature much more willingly.

    1. In our original post, I got it wrong regarding the balance between river flow and electrical generation. There is a small 5 mW power plant 8 kilometres upstream of the falls. During the summer, they release more water from their dam than they require to optimize the attraction of the Voringsfossen falls. (Norway doesn’t need much power for summer air conditioning!)

    1. Perhaps not intentional, but suicidal selfies for the perfect Instagram photo are common in Norway! Now the pictures from the bridge should be spectacular and safe. It links two very steep cliffs beyond the waterfall, so you can look straight down the fallls into its basin, or look along the river on the plateau featuring a pretty historic bridge.

  3. Nice article, the drone footage is awesome along with the airborne photos of the viewing platforms.

    Always the controversy of what is needed and what is not. If we look at transportation solely on fuel consumption what do we deem to be acceptable and what is not.
    Similar to transportation I look at farming and have to ask when was this machinery last tuned up and what about emissions testing for all types of equipment, mining, forestry, transportation etc. No one does emissions testing so where do our carbon numbers come from, hopefully not a politician’s mind as that is a void totally empty of valid facts.

    Next on our list of screwed up usage, or abuse, is what we are doing on a daily basis with nature’s elixir, that of course being water.

    Are we being users or abusers of mother natures offering’s, something to think about and we better move on that idea soon.

    1. An Italian artist,Giorgio Morandi, whose still life-paintings I really like said, “there is nothing more abstract than reality.”

    2. The footprint we leave when we travel is definitely a concern. In our case, touring southern Norway in a motorhome left a larger carbon burden per person than those travelling by cruiseship and bus or van to see the falls. With its long fjords, Norway is one of the world’s most spectacular cruise destinations allowing urban dwellers to observe unspoilt nature. The Norwegian governments decision to build the viewing bridge at Voringsfossen further promotes the opportunity to safely observe something truly spectacular.

      However, while we are still capable and have the luxury of time that many travellers don’t, our preference is to arrive before the tourist buses at the most popular sights, and to have the freedom to descend into the canyons, streams and waterfalls to experience the icy spray face-on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You Not Have Coronavirus

2021 Fortunes

Has the New Year ever been so welcome? We can’t wait for the next decade, for 2021, for surely, surely, the world’s fortunes will be better,

Read More »
Art & Architecture

Stavanger Street Art

Vancouver, alas, subscribes to what I call “Hello Kitty” street art. Birds, bees, butterflies, sanctioned mural festival art that, for the most part, doesn’t challenge

Read More »

Way to Go

Drownded while bathing in open cut. The record book at the Y.O.O.P. Cemetery in Dawson City says that’s how Alex Murchison died on July 2,

Read More »

“Life is What You Bake It”

I was struggling with what to write for our first blog of 2022. Travel plans? Something philosophical? New Year’s resolutions? Aha! Thanks to Magellan I

Read More »